by Jerrold Bartholomew on March 25, 2009
When both spouses of a married couple need nursing home care, the most immediate result is a catastrophic bill of $12,000.00 per month or more. Without the advice of an elder law attorney, the couple will continue to spend down assets until their assets reach just $4,000.00 in cash. Substantially better results can be achieved with some planning, but understanding how to proceed in these circumstances is a delicate matter. The rules are counter-intuitive. [click to continue…]
by Jerrold Bartholomew on October 16, 2008
Medicaid qualification is full of its own jargon that can make the process a mystery to almost anyone. One key concept to understand is the “community spouse resource allowance.” To speak in the jargon of Medicaid for a moment, the community spouse resource allowance is the value of non-exempt assets that a married couple is permitted to keep and still qualify for Medicaid long-term care assistance. That definition is quite a mouthful, so I will break it all down and put it into context.
When one member of a married couple requires long-term care for more than 30 days, an inventory of the couple’s assets as of the day the institutionalized spouse first entered the hospital or nursing home must be prepared. This is done using form DHS 4574-B, the Asset Declaration. This form must accurately describe a couple’s assets, under penalty of law. From this form, a determination is made of how much the couple will be permitted to keep and qualify for Medicaid. Eventually, assets that are retained by the couple will have to be separately titled in the name of the spouse who is not institutionalized. That spouse is called the community spouse. Therefore, the amount the couple can keep is called the community spouse resource allowance. “Resource” means basically the same thing as “asset” for most purposes. The process of dividing assets between what must be spent down and what the community spouse may keep is referred to as the division of assets. Generally speaking, the community spouse will be permitted to keep one half of all countable assets, but no less than $20,800.00 and no more than $104,400.00.
[click to continue…]
by Jerrold Bartholomew on July 31, 2008
QUESTION: I have heard that you are allowed to keep some things and qualify for long-term care Medicaid. What are you allowed to keep?
ANSWER: It is true that some property may be exempt for purposes of Medicaid qualification. And indeed, converting non-exempt assets to exempt assets is one valuable method of spend down. The following items are generally exempt: [click to continue…]
by Jerrold Bartholomew on July 30, 2008
QUESTION: I am concerned about my parents. My dad just entered the nursing home. His care costs more $6,000.00 per month and my mother is almost out of savings. Does she have to sell the house (which is worth about $250,000.00) to pay for my dad’s care? And what about estate recovery? What is that?
ANSWER: Your mother does not have to sell the house and for now, it is safe as long as you follow the proper procedures to qualify for Medicaid. But there are still several concerns here.
First, most people needing nursing home care will end up receiving Medicaid assistance at some point. Many people make the mistake of thinking that they should just pay the nursing home each month without realizing that there are often estate planning options that can prevent the need for a full spend down. Seeing an elder law attorney during a nursing home spend down is a lot like seeing an accountant at tax time: there are a lot of deductions and exclusions that you would not otherwise know about that can cut your tax bill. An elder law attorney can help you minimize your nursing home bill in the same way. [click to continue…]
by Jerrold Bartholomew on May 19, 2008
The reality is that families faced with the chronic illness or disability of a loved-one often have few options but a traditional long-term care facility. Aside from the financial devastation that this usually entails, there is the fact that a traditional nursing home is a difficult place to be in. It is good therefore to see nursing home alternatives emerging, such as described in this story about a new nursing home developing near Grand Rapids, Michigan:
Differing from a traditional “hospital-style” nursing home, the so-called green house concept features smaller facilities designed to create a home-like setting with private rooms, baths and other amenities. Residents still receive the daily assistance and medical care they need, though their activities are not regimented nor predicated on their medical needs.
While the article is silent on the cost of care at this facility, it is not unreasonable to assume that it will be more expensive than traditional nursing home care. If it were otherwise, the article would be trumpeting both higher quality care and lower costs. The fact is that this sort of care remains out of reach for most seniors whose savings would be quickly depleted by the cost of this higher level of assistance. Perhaps the best chance most seniors will have at this sort of care is begin planning early in order to maximize assets.
by Jerrold Bartholomew on April 24, 2008
Sue Schiebel has written an excellent article on Medicaid Planning. While her article concerns MassHealth, which is the Massachusetts Medicaid program, the rules and ideas explained are the same in Michigan. She writes:
A lot of middle-aged people don’t realize Medicare, the federal health insurance program, pays for a very limited amount of skilled nursing home care. As we live longer, that means more of us will have to spend our own money for long-term care or must rely on MassHealth, the state health insurance for low income people. Many people wind up doing both — first using up many of their own assets to “spend down” to Medicaid limits so they are financially eligible for state help.
Medicaid qualification is a complex area of the law. To highlight just one counter-intuitive aspect, consider that donations to a church or charity are treated as gifts under the law. One making such a gift is technically creating a period of ineligibility for Medicaid. Strictly speaking, a person making significant donations to a church could be ineligible for Medicaid for several months after all other assets have been spent down. An elder law attorney helps families cope with these bizarre rules and avoid such unfortunate results.
by Jerrold Bartholomew on April 7, 2008
Retirement assets (401ks, IRAs, etc) are considered available assets for purposes of Medicaid qualification in Michigan. In simple terms, that means that those funds have to be spent down until the threshold for asset eligibility is met. In the case of a single person, asset eligibility is generally about $2,000.00, with some additional allowances for the homestead, modest life insurance and funeral expenses. In the case of a married person, the threshold is higher, and will be between $20,880.00 and $104,400.00, depending on the couple’s assets before entering the nursing home. For more details, see The Basics of Medicaid Qualification, below.
In order to avoid having to spend these assets on the cost of care, it is very common to annuitize the retirement assets. For a variety of reasons, I think this is something to avoid whenever possible. First of all, the return on such annuities is low. With inflation likely to increase in the present economic climate, it is difficult to recommend a long-term investment with a low return. An additional concern is that current law requires an annuity to pay out in level installments and in an actuarially sound manner. The days of the deferred annuity with a substantial amount held until after the passing of the owner are gone. Furthermore, under current law, the state of Michigan must be named as the remainder beneficiary after the community spouse or a disabled child. It is true that an annuity will provide secure retirement income for a community spouse, but it should be considered an alternative of last resort in light of these considerations.
[click to continue…]
by Jerrold Bartholomew on March 7, 2008
An astounding thing happened during the fall of 2007. Michigan changed its Medicaid policy with respect to annuities and implemented those changes with retroactive effect.
The new policy requires annuities to have several features in order to avoid being considered a divestment. Among the requirements is a rule that the state of Michigan must be named a remainder beneficiary to the extent of Medicaid benefits received. This law applies to all annuities purchased or altered after February 8th, 2006, the day President Bush signed the Deficit Reduction Act into law.
[click to continue…]
by Jerrold Bartholomew on March 6, 2008
It is important to understand the basic rules of qualifying for Medicaid Long Term Care Assistance in order to cope with the financial realities of a relative’s long-term care. The rules below apply in Michigan and have been updated for 2008.
First, you should understand that the rules are different for single people and those who are married. To make things just a little more complicated, if both spouses of a married couple are in the nursing home, they are both subject to the rules of a single person, with each spouse qualifying separately.
[click to continue…]
by Jerrold Bartholomew on March 6, 2008
Under previous Medicaid policy, applicants for long term care were given the benefit of a doubt most of the time. In some cases, a demonstrated intent to complete asset conversion, which is the process of converting non-exempt assets into exempt or excluded assets and is the heart of Medicaid planning, would be enough to pass scrutiny.
[click to continue…]