When one spouse requires long-term care in Michigan, the Department of Human Services will do an assessment of the couple’s total resources. Without any planning or asset positioning, the spouse at home will be permitted to keep 1/2 of the couple’s assets as of the date the spouse needing long-term care entered either the hospital or long-term care, with a maximum of $104,400.00 and a minimum of $20,880.00 (in 2008). For example, a marital estate valued at $100,000.00 in non-exempt assets will be limited to $50,000.00 that the at-home spouse can keep. The remainder will have to spent on long-term care or converted to exempt assets before Medicaid will provide assistance with the cost of long-term care.
Read the rest of this entry »

Sue Schiebel has written an excellent article on Medicaid Planning. While her article concerns MassHealth, which is the Massachusetts Medicaid program, the rules and ideas explained are the same in Michigan. She writes:

A lot of middle-aged people don’t realize Medicare, the federal health insurance program, pays for a very limited amount of skilled nursing home care. As we live longer, that means more of us will have to spend our own money for long-term care or must rely on MassHealth, the state health insurance for low income people. Many people wind up doing both — first using up many of their own assets to “spend down” to Medicaid limits so they are financially eligible for state help.

Medicaid qualification is a complex area of the law. To highlight just one counter-intuitive aspect, consider that donations to a church or charity are treated as gifts under the law. One making such a gift is technically creating a period of ineligibility for Medicaid. Strictly speaking, one could then have no means to pay for a nursing home after all other assets have been spent down. An elder law attorney helps families cope with these bizarre rules and avoid such unfortunate results.

Many of my clients are uneasy about placing their assets into a trust as part of an asset protection plan. In order to demystify the process and help you understand why you might consider having a trust drafted for your specific needs, I would like to explain some of the reasons you might consider having a trust and little bit of how a trust works.

Trusts are an important part of elder law and estate planning. Elder law is really the art and science of preserving personal and financial independence for seniors. Many forces threaten a senior’s independence, from ailing health to limited finances to extensive regulatory systems. The goal in creating comprehensive estate plans is to extend resources as much as possible and to create options. How is this possible? The right trust agreement is an important tool for achieving this goal.

Read the rest of this entry »

Retirement assets (401ks, IRAs, etc) are considered available assets for purposes of Medicaid qualification in Michigan. In simple terms, that means that those funds have to be spent down until the threshold for asset eligibility is met. In the case of a single person, asset eligibility is generally about $2,000.00, with some additional allowances for the homestead, modest life insurance and funeral expenses. In the case of a married person, the threshold is higher, and will be between $20,880.00 and $104,400.00, depending on the couple’s assets before entering the nursing home. For more details, see The Basics of Medicaid Qualification, below.

In order to avoid having to spend these assets on the cost of care, it is very common to annuitize the retirement assets. For a variety of reasons, I think this is something to avoid whenever possible. First of all, the return on such annuities is low. With inflation likely to increase in the present economic climate, it is difficult to recommend a long-term investment with a low return. An additional concern is that current law requires an annuity to pay out in level installments and in an actuarially sound manner. The days of the deferred annuity with a substantial amount held until after the passing of the owner are gone. Furthermore, under current law, the state of Michigan must be named as the remainder beneficiary after the community spouse or a disabled child. It is true that an annuity will provide secure retirement income for a community spouse, but it should be considered an alternative of last resort in light of these considerations.

Read the rest of this entry »

Retirement for many people is defined as the time when they are able to live off of the income from their assets combined with Social Security and perhaps a pension. But anything from a car accident to a stay in long term care can quickly deplete retirement assets and jeopardize the fruits of a lifetime’s work. This can be particularly devastating for a married couple when one of the spouses falls ill and the assets of both must be devoted to the care of the other. Medicaid law permits the Community Spouse (the spouse not in long-term care) to retain a maximum of $104,400.00 in non-exempt assets, but without planning, in many cases that amount can be lower.

Read the rest of this entry »

In my practice I have all too often I found evidence that my elderly clients have been victims of financial abuse in one way or another. This story shows just how common the phenomenon is:

Motivated by the high interest rates and the fear that Jeannetta, at least, might outlive their savings, the Mounceys drained their bank accounts and invested $135,000.

“With Jack being so sick, we wanted to make sure we had decent income, because I couldn’t afford our house on my own,” said Jeannetta Mouncey, 64.

Less than a year later, though, the interest checks had stopped and much of the Sarasota couple’s money was unaccounted for. Their First Liberty sales agent, Fred Howard, had disappeared. Eventually, the company went dark, too, its president locked up in an Arizona prison on securities fraud charges.

Read the rest of this entry »

Mr. David Goldman has raised some interesting points regarding the free durable power of attorney posted here and free durable power of attorneys generally. There are many problems with such documents and I have mentioned them in the previous post. Above all, you should certainly understand that any decision you make to use such documents will be your own and cannot be based upon anything written here. Mr. Goldman takes the argument a bit further. The first point he makes is that one should read carefully to be sure “free” documents are in fact free. He found a “free” power of attorney form elsewhere that only revealed in the fine print that you would be charged $19.95 per month for downloading the document.

Read the rest of this entry »

The process is of applying for Medicaid long term care assistance can be somewhat difficult. The documentation requirements can be voluminous and the process will typically take at least 45 days. I have seen several recent cases take as long 4 months to be approved.

Read the rest of this entry »

Many Elder law attorneys advise loving couples to pursue divorce as a method of asset protection. I have never found the technique necessary and, frankly, find the approach ethically questionable. Alternatives exist for both pre-planning and crisis planning that avoid the murky waters of a consensual divorce between an otherwise happily-wed pair. It is my view that you should not have to pretend to be something that you are not in order to protect assets. Everything is always disclosed in the Medicaid applications I advise clients on and the asset protection plans I create. I have helped dozens of couples protect their estates from the cost of long term care and there has never been a reason to resort to divorce.

This post is continuation of what I expect to be a long series on protecting the homestead of long term care patients.

Before the Deficit Reduction Act was signed in February of 2006, it was relatively easy for an elder law attorney or a well-informed layperson to set aside money to pay for the upkeep of a nursing home patient’s homestead. A simple contract could be created and assets transferred to a responsible relative who would pay for the utilities, taxes, insurance and maintenance of the nursing home patient’s home. It also used to be possible to gift a significant amount of money each month. Therefore one could simply give assets to another to keep up the home. These techniques were necessary because a person in a nursing home can generally have only $2,000.00 in cash or equivalent non-exempt assets and all but a small portion of income will go to the cost of care. Since such a small amount of money is dwarfed by property taxes alone, the policy allowing money to be set aside for homestead maintenance made sense for several reasons.

First of all, some people do return home, even after long stays in a nursing home. Second, there are significant tax benefits to waiting until one’s passing to transfer a homestead to a relative. But with the possibility of tax foreclosure or dissipation through neglect, a sale or significant financial hardship is difficult to avoid with the owner in a nursing home. Moreover, Medicaid policy considers the transfer of a homestead a divestment subject to penalty in most cases. Third, the sale of home in financial distress is a loss to an effected family, particularly in today’s troubled real estate market.

Read the rest of this entry »

This article provides some preliminary answers to an important question for today’s retirees and elderly: Is long term care insurance a good idea?

In general, I advise clients to get long term care insurance. The effects of being unprepared for this financial tsunami are too overwhelming to do otherwise. But be careful and be informed.

Among your first questions should be the extent of the coverage and the anticipated premium schedule. It is not uncommon to see nursing home care costs increase 10% or more in a single year. It is therefore important to understand how much coverage is needed and how much adequate coverage will cost.

Once you have that information, consider this: a properly drafted and funded asset protection plan will give you all of the benefits of your assets, but fully protect them from the cost of long term care after five years. When you look at the premiums, the escalation of long term care costs, and the uncertainty of the future, an asset protection estate plan combined with 5 years of long term care insurance makes the most sense for many people.