From the category archives:

Asset Protection

Tougher estate recovery coming to Michigan?

by Jerrold Bartholomew on November 20, 2008

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has apparently rejected Michigan’s proposed estate recovery program. Michigan’s proposed legislation was unique not only for being last in the union to be enacted, but also for being exceptionally lenient. It is therefore reasonable to assume that Michigan will be required to enact a more aggressive approach to estate recovery.

This issue has been appealed by the state of Michigan with a hearing set for January. There will be much more to say on this issue as it develops.

{ 0 comments }

Getting the most from veterans’ benefits

by Jerrold Bartholomew on September 19, 2008

Many veterans are unaware of the Aid and Attendance Pension that is available to help them with their medical expenses, which include the cost of assisted living. Some veterans are simply unaware of this benefit. Others have been told that they do not qualify based on “having too much money.” It is important to understand the scope of the Aid and Attendance pension as a starting point. It is also important to realize that veterans who meet the service requirement and who have significant, reoccurring medical expenses can be eligible for this valuable and well-deserved benefit with proper estate planning.

The aid and attendance pension is available to veterans who served during a time of war. It is not necessary to have participated in combat, but simply to have been in the military during a time of war. In addition to the service requirement, it is also necessary to be medically eligible and to meet the income and asset test. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

FAQ: Is my annuity protected from the cost of nursing home care?

by Jerrold Bartholomew on September 17, 2008

Question: I purchased an annuity in 2007 in the hope that it would be protected from nursing home costs. I have heard some things in the news that make me wonder whether that money will have to go to the cost of nursing home care. What is the truth?

Answer: By itself, an annuity is either an asset, in which case it will be subject to the asset test for Medicaid qualification or an income stream, in which case it will be subject to the owner’s monthly patient pay amount. There is nothing about an annuity that protects it from the cost of nursing home care. But annuities can be valuable tools in asset protection planning.

Exactly how the annuity is treated will depend on whether the annuity has been annuitized (turned into a monthly income stream). As noted in Wikipedia:

There are two possible phases for an annuity, one phase in which the customer deposits and accumulates money into an account (the deferral phase), and the annuity phase in which the insurance company makes income payments until the death of the customers (the “annuitants”) named in the contract. It is possible to structure an annuity contract so that it has only the annuity phase; such a contract is called an immediate annuity. Annuity contracts with a deferral phase are similar to bank CDs and have a growth phase prior to distribution of income, and are called deferred annuities. The newest incarnation is the fixed, equity indexed product which can be either a fixed annuity or pure life insurance.

Annuities in the deferral phase would be treated as an asset and accordingly subject to either the $2,000.00 asset limit for individuals or the more complex rules for spouses.

This situation is complicated further by the new rules under the Deficit Reduction Act that requires you to name the state of Michigan as a beneficiary in order to avoid having the annuity treated as a gift and subject to a penalty period.

Does this mean that annuities cannot be used to shelter assets from the cost of long-term care? No. There are still viable methods of planning with annuities, but a successful outcome will require a thorough understanding of the rules for Medicaid qualification. It makes sense to have annuities reviewed by an elder law attorney prior to purchase. If you have already purchased an annuity and have questions about your exposure to the cost of long-term care, it makes sense to have your annuity contract reviewed by an elder law attorney.

{ 0 comments }

FAQ: I have been turned down for Veterans’ Benefits. What now?

by Jerrold Bartholomew on August 1, 2008

Question: I approached my local Veterans’ Administration office for information about the Aid and Attendance Pension. They told me I had too much money to receive the pension. But I have reoccurring medical expenses of more than $1,000.00 per month. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: This is a delicate situation. On the one hand, some estate planning could allow you to qualify for the Aid and Attendance Pension. On the other, you would be mistaken to think that qualification for the Aid and Attendance Pension alone is sufficient. You need to be planning ahead for Medicaid long-term care at the same time that you are qualifying for veterans’ benefits. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

New changes to Medicaid eligibility rules

by Jerrold Bartholomew on July 27, 2008

The Michigan Department of Human Services has enacted several changes to the Medicaid eligibility rules recently that impact qualification for long-term care Medicaid.

Perhaps the most important change relates to divested assets (gifts) and the calculation of penalty periods. Generally speaking, the gifting of assets results in a period of ineligibility for Medicaid long-term care. Under previous policy, returning some of the gifted assets would result in a partial cancellation of the penalty period. For example, if a long-term care Medicaid applicant had given away $61,910.00, she would ineligible for Medicaid for 10 months ($61,910.00/$6,191.00=10 months). But if that same person returned $30,955.00 ($6,191.00 x 5), the penalty would be reduced to 5 months. This former policy was known as a “partial cure” of a penalty. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Caregiver Stress, Compensation, and Medicaid Qualification

by Jerrold Bartholomew on July 12, 2008

Any adult caregiver who has control over a parent’s assets (such as by power of attorney, as a trustee, or through joint bank accounts) can be in a very dangerous position for several reasons.

First, adult caregivers who receive compensation are vulnerable to charges of undue influence, constructive trust and other damaging allegations. How do these arrangements become such a problem? Consider that in many families, it is common for one child to bear a disproportionate share of the caregiving duties. Second, realize that such a caregiver is generally closer geographically and sometimes emotionally to Mom and Dad. The opportunity for jealousy to develop is obvious as well as the opportunity for wrongdoing. And regardless of what actually happened, it is easy for there to be an appearance of wrongdoing. Finally, bear in mind that caregiving is extremely time-consuming, stressful and expensive for the caregiver. Just as a stay-at-home mother is worth well over $100,000.00 per year in terms of replacement cost, a caregiver often makes an economic sacrifice to take care of Mom and Dad rather than work at a job. When you consider all of these factors together, it is easy to see how there is an emotional thunderstorm forming around the care of many seniors. Money is a significant factor, but it is often less significant than the stress on, and the quality of, relationships among family members. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Medicaid Pre-Planning: How Is It Possible?

by Jerrold Bartholomew on June 13, 2008

Checkerboard PlanningThere are two apparently contradictory themes running throughout this blog and indeed the field of elder law in general. On the one hand, one is regularly advised to plan ahead for long-term care needs with asset protection trusts and similar techniques. On the other hand, the law changes so rapidly in Medicaid qualification that pre-planning seems impossible. For just a few examples consider that recently a cap has been placed on the value of the automobile you can buy, the state has to be named as a remainder beneficiary on annuities, and estate recovery has been enacted. The list of changes is seemingly endless and the pace of change is rapid. So how is it possible to advise people to plan ahead when the law could be different tomorrow?

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Increasing the Community Spouse Resource Allowance

by Jerrold Bartholomew on May 3, 2008

When one spouse requires long-term care in Michigan, the Department of Human Services will do an assessment of the couple’s total resources. Without any planning or asset positioning, the spouse at home will be permitted to keep 1/2 of the couple’s assets as of the date the spouse needing long-term care entered either the hospital or long-term care, with a maximum of $104,400.00 and a minimum of $20,880.00 (in 2008). For example, a marital estate valued at $100,000.00 in non-exempt assets will be limited to $50,000.00 that the at-home spouse can keep. The remainder will have to spent on long-term care or converted to exempt assets before Medicaid will provide assistance with the cost of long-term care.
[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Understanding Medicaid Planning

by Jerrold Bartholomew on April 24, 2008

Sue Schiebel has written an excellent article on Medicaid Planning. While her article concerns MassHealth, which is the Massachusetts Medicaid program, the rules and ideas explained are the same in Michigan. She writes:

A lot of middle-aged people don’t realize Medicare, the federal health insurance program, pays for a very limited amount of skilled nursing home care. As we live longer, that means more of us will have to spend our own money for long-term care or must rely on MassHealth, the state health insurance for low income people. Many people wind up doing both — first using up many of their own assets to “spend down” to Medicaid limits so they are financially eligible for state help.

Medicaid qualification is a complex area of the law. To highlight just one counter-intuitive aspect, consider that donations to a church or charity are treated as gifts under the law. One making such a gift is technically creating a period of ineligibility for Medicaid. Strictly speaking, a person making significant donations to a church could be ineligible for Medicaid for several months after all other assets have been spent down. An elder law attorney helps families cope with these bizarre rules and avoid such unfortunate results.

{ 1 comment }

Learning to Juggle with Your Property

by Jerrold Bartholomew on April 24, 2008

Many of my clients are uneasy about placing their assets into a trust as part of an asset protection plan. In order to demystify the process and help you understand why you might consider having a trust drafted for your specific needs, I would like to explain some of the reasons you might consider having a trust and little bit of how a trust works.

Trusts are an important part of elder law and estate planning. Elder law is really the art and science of preserving personal and financial independence for seniors. Many forces threaten a senior’s independence, from ailing health to limited finances to extensive regulatory systems. The goal in creating comprehensive estate plans is to extend resources as much as possible and to create options. How is this possible? The right trust agreement is an important tool for achieving this goal.

[click to continue…]

{ 2 comments }